>>715073521
>that webm
feel bad because the dude looks very normal and could definitely do better. woman has "corgi mom" in her twitter bio so i'd figure she would happy to not be left to spinster-dom. but if i'm remembering right, she hosted a few nights ago and was VERY heavy on the trans-rights stuff. i wonder if part of her reaction is driven by embarrassment because her GDQ aren't gonna like this display of heteronormative commitment on their "queer"-friendly space

has there EVER been a host who actually improved the viewing experience or was actually funny? trying to think of an example and i'm blanking, meaning the only way to be a "good" host is just to speak as little as possible

REDEMPTION
LOVE WINS
LOVE WINS
LOVE WINS
/V/IRGINS BTFO