>>105758539
I don't agree.

>>105682308
Without knowing what the exact prompt is, this comparison is kind of useless. Maybe it may be more biased by default, but when testing my usual prompt where the first thing I ask for the for photo be amateur, I have found the opposite to be true. The model (barring the calibrated version due to being behind in merging as discussed in the Discord screenshot) is actually better at consistently producing photoreal skin than before.

Another slopped seed. There's something special about how v36 handles these. Then again, maybe it's just luck.