Search Results
ID: K1sZRPdO/pol/511036470#511044147
7/22/2025, 2:58:18 PM
>>511036470
Thank God my parents weren't into gambling, apart from the occasional lotto ticket.
Thank God my parents weren't into gambling, apart from the occasional lotto ticket.
ID: vlTlmvGc/pol/510793125#510799380
7/19/2025, 2:06:51 PM
>>510793985
Estrogen levels stay largely normal in fatties, it just inhibits testosterone production via negative feedback inhibition of hypothalamic function by estrogen.
This reduces the testosterone to estrogen ratio.
Estrogen levels stay largely normal in fatties, it just inhibits testosterone production via negative feedback inhibition of hypothalamic function by estrogen.
This reduces the testosterone to estrogen ratio.
ID: PoL/85oZ/pol/510636250#510638530
7/17/2025, 6:08:58 PM
>>510637178
You better believe it, Sonny Jim !
You better believe it, Sonny Jim !
ID: 9fu+dWc0/pol/510264152#510267179
7/13/2025, 3:58:37 PM
>>510264152
I don't have a sex drive.
I don't have a sex drive.
ID: zz76EZuX/pol/509901976#509913074
7/9/2025, 1:54:53 PM
>>509909034
"Fapping" is worse. It's called wanking.
"Fapping" is worse. It's called wanking.
ID: Ru/OPpQR/pol/509897907#509899437
7/9/2025, 8:35:20 AM
>>509898530
The Contradiction
The speaker says:
“I would accept them if they passed, but they mostly just look like men.”
This implies:
They can tell the person is trans.
Therefore, they are not passing (in their eyes).
Therefore, they are not accepted.
But here’s the problem:
1. If someone truly passes, the speaker wouldn't know they are transgender.
2. Therefore, the speaker is only seeing trans people who don’t pass.
3. They’re unaware of those who do pass.
4. So they conclude “they mostly don’t pass”, but that’s based on a biased sample, only the ones they can detect.
This is known as a:
Sampling Bias (or Survivorship Bias)
The speaker is unaware of the trans people who do pass, precisely because those people "pass" and are invisible to their detection.
So they falsely generalize from the visible cases and assume that most trans people don’t pass.
Combined with Circular Reasoning
They are saying:
“I would accept them if they passed.”
“But I don’t accept them because they don’t pass.”
While not realizing: if they did pass, they wouldn't even know.
So yes, it's contradictory and logically flawed.
The Contradiction
The speaker says:
“I would accept them if they passed, but they mostly just look like men.”
This implies:
They can tell the person is trans.
Therefore, they are not passing (in their eyes).
Therefore, they are not accepted.
But here’s the problem:
1. If someone truly passes, the speaker wouldn't know they are transgender.
2. Therefore, the speaker is only seeing trans people who don’t pass.
3. They’re unaware of those who do pass.
4. So they conclude “they mostly don’t pass”, but that’s based on a biased sample, only the ones they can detect.
This is known as a:
Sampling Bias (or Survivorship Bias)
The speaker is unaware of the trans people who do pass, precisely because those people "pass" and are invisible to their detection.
So they falsely generalize from the visible cases and assume that most trans people don’t pass.
Combined with Circular Reasoning
They are saying:
“I would accept them if they passed.”
“But I don’t accept them because they don’t pass.”
While not realizing: if they did pass, they wouldn't even know.
So yes, it's contradictory and logically flawed.
ID: u/vR5tXn/pol/509830347#509833652
7/8/2025, 4:37:31 PM
>>509830347
What happened to her face?
What happened to her face?
Page 1