>>64079256
>>64079285
I always wanted a break down and review of the Colt 605 fire selector
>how reliable was it?
>how was it tensioned? Could you easily do a full 360 degree rotation without noticing?
>how often were the cams modified for different burst-fires?
seems neat

>The modified lower receiver incorporated a four-position selector switch (developed by Foster Sturtevant in December 1966) so that a user could select safe, semi-automatic, three-round burst, or full automatic modes of fire. Unlike the standard three-position group, the four-position group went from (going clockwise from the 9 o'clock position) safe, fully automatic, semi-automatic and finally burst. The selector itself had 360 degrees of motion, and could be moved either clockwise or counterclockwise, unlike with standard groups. Instead of three-round burst, the burst cam could be modified to two-round or six-round burst.

>>64075763
except they don't have the knowledge of a single Click or Clack yet alone both of them when it comes to guns.