Search Results
6/28/2025, 4:09:21 AM
Darwinists seriously think random DNA copying mistakes resulted in different mechanisms that are all useless or harmful by themselves until they're fully completed.
This is a really good example, it has two chemicals that when touch explode at 100C.
Every part of this is useless or harmful and would remain so for countless millions of generations, never having any reason to be selected for at best, until all of the different parts were completed... randomly.
This is essentially like me flipping random bits in your OS and expecting to get new features.
>>713855771
Darwinists are so retarded they think anatomically modern humans did nothing for 200,000 to 300,000 years and then all the sudden 4 years ago decided to create civilizations, writing systems, calendars, and start recording documents.
This is a really good example, it has two chemicals that when touch explode at 100C.
Every part of this is useless or harmful and would remain so for countless millions of generations, never having any reason to be selected for at best, until all of the different parts were completed... randomly.
This is essentially like me flipping random bits in your OS and expecting to get new features.
>>713855771
Darwinists are so retarded they think anatomically modern humans did nothing for 200,000 to 300,000 years and then all the sudden 4 years ago decided to create civilizations, writing systems, calendars, and start recording documents.
6/22/2025, 5:14:29 PM
>>713350768
Darwinists seriously think random DNA copying mistakes resulted in different mechanisms that are all useless or harmful by themselves until they're fully completed.
This is a really good example, it has two chemicals that when touch explode at 100C.
Every part of this is useless or harmful and would remain so for countless millions of generations, never having any reason to be selected for at best, until all of the different parts were completed... randomly.
This is essentially like me flipping random bits in your OS and expecting to get new features.
Darwinists are so stupid they see natural selection and think it must be limitless, they must also think if they keep jumping they'll launch into space.
Darwinists seriously think random DNA copying mistakes resulted in different mechanisms that are all useless or harmful by themselves until they're fully completed.
This is a really good example, it has two chemicals that when touch explode at 100C.
Every part of this is useless or harmful and would remain so for countless millions of generations, never having any reason to be selected for at best, until all of the different parts were completed... randomly.
This is essentially like me flipping random bits in your OS and expecting to get new features.
Darwinists are so stupid they see natural selection and think it must be limitless, they must also think if they keep jumping they'll launch into space.
6/19/2025, 5:56:12 AM
Darwinists seriously think random DNA copying mistakes resulted in different mechanisms that are all useless or harmful by themselves until they're fully completed.
This is a really good example, it has two chemicals that when touch explode at 100C.
Every part of this is useless or harmful and would remain so for countless millions of generations, never having any reason to be selected for at best, until all of the different parts were completed... randomly.
This is essentially like me flipping random bits in your OS and expecting to get new features.
This is a really good example, it has two chemicals that when touch explode at 100C.
Every part of this is useless or harmful and would remain so for countless millions of generations, never having any reason to be selected for at best, until all of the different parts were completed... randomly.
This is essentially like me flipping random bits in your OS and expecting to get new features.
Page 1