Search Results
7/9/2025, 11:14:40 AM
>>105845760
>remarkably poor excuse for not letting you undo a trivial command with a single keyword.
but if your simple command is "wipe the disk and replace it with all zeros", how exactly are you supposed to undo it? it's a very straightforward command. it's also completely irreversible due to hardware limitations. how exactly do you propose this command be made reversible?
>don't allow the command
see, now we're getting somewhere. you want people to hold your little babby hand so you're not allowed to do anything the developers of the program cannot reverse. is that it? did I get it right?
>remarkably poor excuse for not letting you undo a trivial command with a single keyword.
but if your simple command is "wipe the disk and replace it with all zeros", how exactly are you supposed to undo it? it's a very straightforward command. it's also completely irreversible due to hardware limitations. how exactly do you propose this command be made reversible?
>don't allow the command
see, now we're getting somewhere. you want people to hold your little babby hand so you're not allowed to do anything the developers of the program cannot reverse. is that it? did I get it right?
6/14/2025, 1:39:28 PM
>>211721202
>I am so tired after a long shift of producing law at the law factory that people will go to buy at the law store
>I am so tired after a long shift of producing law at the law factory that people will go to buy at the law store
Page 1