>>510116169
there are no mammals who differ morphologically between the sexes. So why do we seem to believe this even when that ideal morphology is not even consistent among the sexes

>>509565323
>*NeoGlobalsim thread*
>Do you know that our planet's resources are limited?
So perhaps you may find it ironic that a complete critique of global order would take you in a full circle, but not Heidegger. Heideggar understood the distinction between Being, Presence, and how things appear in the moment. Everything is fake and gay. So the only viable solution is to do it all for reals. An actual global system, that produces real value (beauty), has a real religion/governance (control), managed by a true leader, that brings about our awareness of actual differences (justice).

I am a difference which makes a difference
We are the difference we make

>>509411914
the two males are a different species of primate

Homo Erectus is an aquatic ape. Uprightness is an adaptation to swimming and living a semi aquatic life. It is intuitively obvious and provable that the actual speciation which occurs among higher apes is the ability to swim and stand upright. When I say swim I do not mean dog paddle like Michael Phelps, but as a method obligated to a fully upright resting posture. There is nothing incorrect or pathological about the appearance of Akhenaten. He is a good example of an upright ape. He is the ape that swims and walks with his legs to free the hands for tool use as he is correctly depicted. What we call Homo Erectus is more correctly identified by the event we point to in which the ape survived by standing upright. Uprightness is the most robust configuration for optimal cognitive function. He who stands upright does not use his hands to walk. His brain, which evolved for balancing on two legs, is equally useful for abstraction. If communication is but a tool for pointing with words, it is easy to understand why the upright primate, which is the tool wielding species, will utilize language to establish order among communities. It was made possible therefore to use language as a recursive extension of his cognitive domain. The dominance hierarchy for the upright primate was able to extend beyond Erectus alone.