>>714204870
People should have offline singleplayer and be able to host private multiplayer servers. That's literally it.

>>714193942
>talking about having the right to host private servers? GO BACK TO /POL/ CHUD
Sorry, we'll post a Nintendo cockmunching/Gacha trash AGP tranny ERP/AI jeet slopping/xitter screenshot culture war thread next time.
>>714193872
Holy shit, I think there's still hope. 280k more signatures in a month can easily be achieved.
>>714194245
>devs and publishers will [STOP BEING LAZY RETARDED FUCKS] if skg succeeds
why is this a bad thing?

Your favourite videogames could become unplayable and go offline without any way to play them, and there's nothing you can do about it.

>Oh but I only play singleplayer games
Doesn't matter. Nowadays, most major games are playable online because of DRM even if they're singleplayer so they can still pull the plug on it whenever they want. There are precedents for this.

Not even piracy can solve this.

You will neve own anything, and you will be happy....

Unless?

How about you all go sign the petition instead of arguing about this silly game?