RMS wrote the free C compiler. (and the free editor) (and the free *nix tools)
>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>--------------------------
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>--------------------------
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia

Based Stallman Loli Lover.
(BSL Linux)

You may force a man against his will,
but he will be of the same opinion still.

>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>--------------------------
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>--------------------------
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia

>The essential characteristic of a license is that it is revocable at
>the will of the possessor of the land, subject only to the licensee’s
>right to be on the land for a reasonable time after revocation for
>the purpose of removing his goods thereon. Even though the
>revocation of a license may be a breach of contract and give rise to
>an action for damages, it is effective to deprive the licensee of all
>justification for entering or remaining on the land except as
>provided above.

https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017

>>105785027
Marry little girls.

I notice you haven't posted your email chat with metux.
Why is that?
Not on the mailing list zoomer?
Why is it that I checked my email: and lo-and-behold metux's emails are there?
SOMEHOW this "no coder" is on a C mailing list: before all this controversy occured. HOW IS THAT?
Zoomer fuck.

YHWH allows child brides.
Marry little virgin girls

>>105785027
Marry little girls.

I notice you haven't posted your email chat with metux.
Why is that?
Not on the mailing list zoomer?
Why is it that I checked my email: and lo-and-behold metux's emails are there?
SOMEHOW this "no coder" is on a C mailing list: before all this controversy occured. HOW IS THAT?
Zoomer fuck.

YHWH allows child brides.
Marry little virgin girls

>>508721292
Yes it is balls.
Killing your enemies.
Putting a shotgun under the chin of "your" wife who left you and is having sex with other men, and pulling the trigger.
Raping and marrying little girls.

That is balls. Which you white christians do not have. Your Jesus cut them off and made you doemesticated faggots. (Matthew 19, greek)

Hour of the wolf.

You owe nothing to these people who deny you cute little virgin girls of your own clan.
They are your enemies.

>>507880124
Whites are domesticated cattle.
Actual men took little girls as brides.
Which is why men fought wars:
they were promised and obtained little girls from neighboring town.

You white fags have white faggot washed history.
You don't even know the payment structure. Faggot white. fuck.

Know how the first armies in Sumer were raised?
Know where money comes from.

In Sumer there was a law: if you rape a little girl child you pay 40 of the Sumerian currency.

>How do I get that?
The Sumerian army pays in the Sumerian currency.

>So if I get 40 I can rape a cute little girl of my choice and keep her
Yes.

>But how do I eat.
Land taxes can be paid in kind or in currency.
Grain or money.
The currency is just invented.
Landowners give grain up straight, or money.
Sumer also buys grain using the money: which can pay taxes.
The money is desired because men want to fuck little girls and rule over them.

Same law exists in YHWH's law in the 5th book.
Whites fucking SEETHE


Up till 1850 this is how armies were paid aswell.
It was taken away from civillians centuries prior; but still existed in english law for a time.
Whites will claim otherwise because they are liars.
In lawschool, in the casebook on Property ("101") it was noted that a man could rape a girl, and if no one objected, he kept her. This was a relic of the old way.

You're not paid money, white faggot.
Money buys little girls.

You owe nothing to these people who deny you cute little virgin girls of your own clan
They are your enemies_