>>40774560
>Like this matters when you're on the surface for multiple days
of course it does. have you ever looked at the temps measured on the moon by the ALSEP units deployed during the missions?
>using two car batteries
another sad example of moonhoaxer ignorance and their need to deliberately mistate the truth using mockery. In fact, the LM has a lot of battry power on board. the descent stage had 5x400amp batteries and its these which provided power for the liquid coolant to be pumped around the cabin and then out to the sublimator unit. the ascent stage had 2x300amp batteries, since it was only detached from the descent stage for a relatively short time.
>on the mission control projector.
no, you have things mixed up. what happened, and only for apollo due to equipment upgrades in later missions, is that the signal broadcast from the LM back to earth was an a combined (unified) format, meaning that all the information (telemetry, the video etc) was all contained inside one continuous radi0 signal. that had to be separated out either at the receiving radio telscope or at mission control. the video footage was displayed on a display which was able to use the extracted data stream, and that was filmed using a standard broadcast camera. that was the best way at the time to change the format of the video stream and get it onto the TV networks.
The tapes that were copied over were the backups tapes from the receiving radio telescope. all of the data was extracted from them. the only thing missing is the slightly higher resolution video stream, since they still didn't have a better way to extract it.

there is no missing footage - we can see everything that was filmed.

THEN, what you are ignoring, is that all the footage, of higher quality, from all the other landings, is available.

>>40758253
it can, but not when they were there. the missions always landed in early lunar morning.

>>16726217
it will begin to cool ONLY through radiative heat loss...it will also receive incoming heat through the same way, depending on if its in full sun, full shade, or some combination. remember that it was bright silver in color too, so quite reflective.

temp changes through only radiation are pretty slow. theres absolutely no evidence that anything, let alone the film inside the camera, ever reached such a high temp as they decided on. all the evidence we have from instruments placed on the lunar surface is that the absolute maximum temp reached in full sun light was about 7c, while they were there.
picrel is from the Lunar Surface Temperatures From Apollo 11 Data document.