Search Results
7/2/2025, 6:35:04 PM
>>33306060
Cathocultists don't ever have any actual arguments to defend their "trust the experts" NPC cult, even their priests are NPCs who "trust the experts" of their bishops, who the Bible says must be married but they teach the opposite and have forced bishops to divorce.
>1 Timothy 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
They certainly can't argue from Scripture because all they know are a few cherrypicked verses out of context and misinterpreted to defend all their unbiblical practices adopted from Hinduism, and they can't understand the Bible anyway because they're not even saved and the Bible teaches the word of God is spiritual and the natural man can't receive the things of the Spirit of God.
>John 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
>1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Mary isn't a co-redeemer. Mary isn't a co-savior. Mary isn't the "cause of salvation". The "Pope" isn't the "Holy Father", only God the Father is. Only Jesus is a mediator and redeemer, only Jesus saves. Just admit you don't care what God's Word says at all since you care about the traditions of man more than the Word of God.
>Mark 7:13 Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
Catholics don't even take this seriously, it's just like team sports politics to them or posting ebin may mays online. Your cult is sending billions of people to hell with its false works-based self-righteous Pharisee gospel.
>Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
Cathocultists don't ever have any actual arguments to defend their "trust the experts" NPC cult, even their priests are NPCs who "trust the experts" of their bishops, who the Bible says must be married but they teach the opposite and have forced bishops to divorce.
>1 Timothy 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
They certainly can't argue from Scripture because all they know are a few cherrypicked verses out of context and misinterpreted to defend all their unbiblical practices adopted from Hinduism, and they can't understand the Bible anyway because they're not even saved and the Bible teaches the word of God is spiritual and the natural man can't receive the things of the Spirit of God.
>John 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
>1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Mary isn't a co-redeemer. Mary isn't a co-savior. Mary isn't the "cause of salvation". The "Pope" isn't the "Holy Father", only God the Father is. Only Jesus is a mediator and redeemer, only Jesus saves. Just admit you don't care what God's Word says at all since you care about the traditions of man more than the Word of God.
>Mark 7:13 Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
Catholics don't even take this seriously, it's just like team sports politics to them or posting ebin may mays online. Your cult is sending billions of people to hell with its false works-based self-righteous Pharisee gospel.
>Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
6/29/2025, 1:37:53 PM
>>509027849
The Greek text does matter, and no, it’s not a “20-year-old Protestant lie.” It’s been discussed since the early Church.
In Matthew 16:18, Jesus says: “You are Peter [Petros], and on this rock [petra] I will build My church.”
The words Petros (masculine) and petra (feminine) are different in form and in meaning. Petros was typically used for a stone or small rock, while petra meant bedrock, massive rock, or foundation. That’s not Protestant spin, it’s classical Greek.
Some argue that Jesus probably spoke Aramaic, where the word kepha would have been used for both. Maybe. But Matthew chose to write it in Greek under guidance of the Holy Spirit, and he deliberately used two different words.
Also, look at the context. Just a few verses later, Peter is rebuked as “Satan” for opposing the cross. Not exactly the foundation you want for the eternal Church. Peter himself never claims to be the foundation. He points to Jesus as the “chief cornerstone” (1Peter 2:6). Paul agrees: “No other foundation can be laid except Jesus Christ” (1Corinthians 3:11).
Even if you take “rock” as Peter, the early church didn’t treat him like a pope. In Acts 15, it’s James who gives the final decision, not Peter. Authority was shared, not centralized. So it’s not a “Protestant lie". It’s called reading Scripture carefully, in context, and not building a world empire on one verse. The true Rock of the Church is Christ Himself, immovable, eternal, and still standing.
Then what about Mark 8 and Luke 9?
The whole “You are Peter, and on this rock” line is missing.
Same event, same confession, but no mention of Peter receiving authority, keys, or a special position.
If Peter’s authority was truly the foundation of Christ’s Church, it’s strange that two of the three Synoptic Gospels leave it out completely. The only constant in all three accounts is Peter’s confession, “You are the Christ.” That’s the real rock.
The Greek text does matter, and no, it’s not a “20-year-old Protestant lie.” It’s been discussed since the early Church.
In Matthew 16:18, Jesus says: “You are Peter [Petros], and on this rock [petra] I will build My church.”
The words Petros (masculine) and petra (feminine) are different in form and in meaning. Petros was typically used for a stone or small rock, while petra meant bedrock, massive rock, or foundation. That’s not Protestant spin, it’s classical Greek.
Some argue that Jesus probably spoke Aramaic, where the word kepha would have been used for both. Maybe. But Matthew chose to write it in Greek under guidance of the Holy Spirit, and he deliberately used two different words.
Also, look at the context. Just a few verses later, Peter is rebuked as “Satan” for opposing the cross. Not exactly the foundation you want for the eternal Church. Peter himself never claims to be the foundation. He points to Jesus as the “chief cornerstone” (1Peter 2:6). Paul agrees: “No other foundation can be laid except Jesus Christ” (1Corinthians 3:11).
Even if you take “rock” as Peter, the early church didn’t treat him like a pope. In Acts 15, it’s James who gives the final decision, not Peter. Authority was shared, not centralized. So it’s not a “Protestant lie". It’s called reading Scripture carefully, in context, and not building a world empire on one verse. The true Rock of the Church is Christ Himself, immovable, eternal, and still standing.
Then what about Mark 8 and Luke 9?
The whole “You are Peter, and on this rock” line is missing.
Same event, same confession, but no mention of Peter receiving authority, keys, or a special position.
If Peter’s authority was truly the foundation of Christ’s Church, it’s strange that two of the three Synoptic Gospels leave it out completely. The only constant in all three accounts is Peter’s confession, “You are the Christ.” That’s the real rock.
6/27/2025, 2:18:51 PM
>>17791676
You Catholics are not Christians, you are pagans who worship false idols.
You Catholics are not Christians, you are pagans who worship false idols.
6/20/2025, 8:07:17 PM
Reminder that Catholics are not Christian and never will be. They are pagans who worship false idols and teach false doctrines mentioned nowhere in the Bible
Page 1