>>715982340
Nice deflection with some baby-like name calling.
Insulting people doesn't make your argument valid, it just make you look like more of a clown.
Here, have this.

I was thinking... Pic rel pretty much garantees there's some people willing to "defend" a shitty game to farm this kind of attention, do you think it fooled excs into thinking they would always have people willing to defend and buy their shit?

>>713147793
>Like a game having anime style presentation