Search Results
7/16/2025, 7:10:10 PM
>>63989678
Georgia status: howling
Georgia status: howling
6/19/2025, 10:26:30 PM
America would have objectively been better off if southerners, both white and black, were either deported or genocided and replaced with Northern Whites.
Prove me wrong(you literally can't)
>inb4 b-b-but muh genocide can't be done, it's too costly!!!!!!
Tell that to the injuns faggot. 30% of the southern male population was dead. A genocide would have been a cakewalk, especially with 2 million Union soldiers(and millions more available for recruitment) and the Northern war machine at full production.
This is if we chose the hardest path(genocide) btw. If we just went with deporting the blacks and dixiefags, it would have been even easier.
Prove me wrong(you literally can't)
>inb4 b-b-but muh genocide can't be done, it's too costly!!!!!!
Tell that to the injuns faggot. 30% of the southern male population was dead. A genocide would have been a cakewalk, especially with 2 million Union soldiers(and millions more available for recruitment) and the Northern war machine at full production.
This is if we chose the hardest path(genocide) btw. If we just went with deporting the blacks and dixiefags, it would have been even easier.
6/15/2025, 11:28:03 PM
America would have objectively been better off if the South was systematically destroyed, and every single southerner, white and black, was either genocided or deported and replaced with Northern Whites.
The North very much had the capabilities to do this, and the Union Army could have carried out a full blown genocide with relative ease considering the fact taht 30% of the white male population of the South was dead and the Northern war machine was at full production.
Lincoln holding Sherman and Sheridan back was a cuck move, and he payed for it in the end.
/pol/ is 100% right on this argument. Prove me wrong(still haven't been proven wrong because I can't be proven wrong)
The North very much had the capabilities to do this, and the Union Army could have carried out a full blown genocide with relative ease considering the fact taht 30% of the white male population of the South was dead and the Northern war machine was at full production.
Lincoln holding Sherman and Sheridan back was a cuck move, and he payed for it in the end.
/pol/ is 100% right on this argument. Prove me wrong(still haven't been proven wrong because I can't be proven wrong)
6/14/2025, 5:12:12 PM
America would have objectively been better off if the South was systematically destroyed, and every single southerner, white and black, was either genocided or deported and replaced with Northern Whites.
The North very much had the capabilities to do this, and the Union Army could have carried out a full blown genocide with relative ease considering the fact that 30% of the white male population of the South was dead and the Northern war machine was at full production.
Lincoln holding Sherman and Sheridan back was a cuck move, and he(and the country as a whole) payed for it in the end.
Everything wrong with modern America can be traced back to the sparing of the South.
/pol/ is 100% right on this argument. Prove me wrong(still haven't been proven wrong because I can't be proven wrong)
The North very much had the capabilities to do this, and the Union Army could have carried out a full blown genocide with relative ease considering the fact that 30% of the white male population of the South was dead and the Northern war machine was at full production.
Lincoln holding Sherman and Sheridan back was a cuck move, and he(and the country as a whole) payed for it in the end.
Everything wrong with modern America can be traced back to the sparing of the South.
/pol/ is 100% right on this argument. Prove me wrong(still haven't been proven wrong because I can't be proven wrong)
Page 1