>>127135442
well i reject the term slop entirely as it's a self-soothing buzzphrase for the pseud masses to give themselves the illusion of superiority. 'slop' aka low quality content was everywhere even before AI came around. AI will flood the landscape and cause a sea change and it will have positive and negative impacts, like anything

AI is already used in hollywood to enhance the workflow in numerous ways- when they made movie posters for a24 civil war, was the media 'negatively effected' by that? what about in the brutalist when they used AI to fix his accent, was the movie negatively effected? when you paint something distracting out of the background of a photo with genfill, is the media negatively effected?

eventually ppl will come around to the idea that it often has a Positive impact on media, actually

>>212577610
no you got wooshed