>I hate how disrespectful this is. Ofc they turned off the comments too
nooo dont quote words we disagree with! he's barely cold!

niggers arent actually human beings…they are some sort of warped abomination analog of the human race

people have always written pastiches/sequels to dead author's works and shit. remixing their existing work, or using their own words/photos/whatever is somehow morbid and wrong?

>You're currently banned from this community and can't comment on posts.
lol mate did you get banned from the David Lynch subreddit and immediately come here?
is there a good story behind this one, at least?

>>212574939 (OP)
>David's biggest hurdle to making new movies was needing studio backing
So why are people surprised he supported a way of making movies that didn't require an entire workforce behind it?

>>212575060
we do a little trolling

>>212574996
nailed it

what they dont realize is what they really mean is a compliment, that AI is such a notable visual leap towards realism and fooling the eye that it's almost disrespectful on a 'misinfo' level. like 'wont somebody think of the children who might see this and believe it'

David Lynch was pro-AI and expressed pro-AI sentiments in multiple interviews and private conversations, calling the technology "fantastic".
>Artificial intelligence? He’s always been seen as someone who embraces new technologies. “I think it’s fantastic. I know a lot of people are afraid of it. I’m sure, like everything, they say it’ll be used for good or for bad. I think it’d be incredible as a tool for creativity and for machines to help creativity. The good side of it’s important for moving forward in a beautiful way.” But does he acknowledge the threat it poses to creative industries? “I’m sure with all these things, if money is the bottom line, there’d be a lot of sadness, and despair and horror. But I’m hoping better times are coming.”
The coping and seething from Lynch fans who all hate AI and can't handle the idea that Lynch loved AI is kind of amazing.

>>212575060
Reddit is like 4chan if every OP had the power to ban anyone they want from their threads, so being banned all the time is pretty common since OPs are fucking gay everywhere.

redditoids hate AI because they see themselves as creatives and AI is better than them at creating art (because they suck)

>>212574939 (OP)
Jeet thread

>>212576041

>>212574967
So you're saying they should be LYNCHED?

>>212576041
theyre trying to figure out how to make ghibli ai pics for their dating app profiles

>>212574996
like all the authors making lovecraftian novels, while despising the author and making the series about love and hope instead?

>>212576842
That's retarded. The difference between a toddler and Dali is how many hours of experience Dali had. Dali made a thousand bad drawings before making good ones. The toddler is at the start of his journey, sweating over the bad ones.

>>212574939 (OP)
I mean Lynch was a sex cult retard spook piece of shit pervert so who the fuck cares?

>>212575077
>that didn't require an entire workforce behind it?
Yeah, it just needed the entire human creative output from the beginning of recorded history, but since no one has been compensated, it isn't technically work goy.

>>212577610
no you got wooshed

hoes mad

>>212575677
4chan is far more heavily moderated than Reddit

>>212579597
lol, lmao even. you can't even call a bitch fat on reddit without being banned

I’d rather watch an AI movie than jeet slop. All these Indians posting shitty short films are ruining my feed.

>>212577850
Who cares, you can’t stop this train. Most of these artists suck anyways. Their careers never even began.

>>212574939 (OP)
>Conversation that never happened
>Jewess profits off Lynch's death by using AI to Deepfake Lynch's voice creating phony interview
>AI Lynch approves of SkyNet so normies will
How Lynchian

>>212579597
4chan is more bot-infested than Reddit too. I'm pretty sure I'm the only human who uses it anymore.

>>212580321
the cope is real

some of yall

>>212580343
All of this is true though.

>>212582153
>i relate to 5 front page plebbitors pulling any reach they can image to deny Lynch's very obvious pro Ai message
let this be a moment of self reflection for you then

>>212580341
How can you say that when you have me over here

>>212576842
That's an asspull argument. If you actually look at history of art it was always first and foremost about skill and effort. Art was always about celebrating human capabilities of creating art. Only very recently in the postmodern era new wave of artists started to reject this legacy and painting dots on a canvas as an act of contrarianism. But even they are better than AI fags because AI fags are literally just a bunch of tech-illiterate browmoids who treat AI as a god

>>212582491
You're confusing the ends and the means. The skill and effort was necessary to create something beautiful, so that skill and effort was celebrated. But if it created something ugly instead, then the skill and effort were meaningless and they wouldn't have been celebrated. It was ultimately the outcome that mattered, what you were able to create through that effort.

>>212582491
>If you actually look at history of art it was always first
>history
>was
there's your problem. youre applying old standards to a new tech that does not adhere to them

yes, thats how it WAS. AI is changing that. lot of people are going to have a very hard time with this change

If I may... Um, I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here, it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step. You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could.

>>212574939 (OP)
don't know why people are surprised by this

lynch was using digital cameras when hollywood filmmakers still thought that was taboo because they should film should shot on film

>>212582491
But the only ones complaining about AI are the hysterical whores who made every excuse under the sun for modern "art" which already rendered art meaningless...as an art.
It is a mere commodity. It is entertainment only.
AI suits it and furries won't overpay you for shitscribbles anymore.

>>212574939 (OP)
>only source for this is the word of a woman actively promoting AI
yeah this should totally be believed without any further proof

>>212582153
It is not up to you to decide what tools other people are allowed to invent on their computer to automate things you wrongfully pretended were "sacred" and required "human soul".

>>212583348
>the only source
In an interview withSight and Sound, Lynch described AI as “fantastic.”
>the only source
In an interview withThe Film Stage, Lynch described the AI remastering of Inland Empire:
"we’ve got this AI thing going towards it with algorithms, or whatever they use—and lo and behold: I saw now this… depth coming. Beauty coming. Deeper colors. More focus. Richer look. It was a miracle"

help me out, does Lyonne run every film interview site in town?