>>149557547
>name a single talented writer he can hire
Me.

>>714908165
>>714908234
What these threads always teach me isn't that localizations are bad, but that the anons who complain about them are so deeply autistic they can't wrap their head around idioms, and therefore can't grasp the English phrase conveys the exact same meaning as the Japanese one despite not being a word-for-word transcription.

Imagine dedicating this much time and energy to complain about an inaccurate translation only to - in exquisite detail - showcase that it is accurate.