Search Results
ID: ruhddSeM/pol/508848116#508876219
6/27/2025, 4:54:59 PM
ID: r4l8XkdH/pol/508681494#508691806
6/25/2025, 4:23:44 PM
>>508690724
>Potentially, yeah.
Once you can prove that, I'll consider your position further.
>>508690724
>No but you're saying that I'm relying faith more than you, which is an untrue statement
It's very true due to your previous statement of 'Potentially, yeah'.....when does the universe derive it's potential?
You are like an electron of electricity arguing that the electrical generation station doesn't exist.
And to claim that man's imperfect understanding of God somehow negates the existence of God is a fallacy that should get you banned from 4Chan.
>Potentially, yeah.
Once you can prove that, I'll consider your position further.
>>508690724
>No but you're saying that I'm relying faith more than you, which is an untrue statement
It's very true due to your previous statement of 'Potentially, yeah'.....when does the universe derive it's potential?
You are like an electron of electricity arguing that the electrical generation station doesn't exist.
And to claim that man's imperfect understanding of God somehow negates the existence of God is a fallacy that should get you banned from 4Chan.
Page 1