>>531613692
>take in refugees
>use their child as meat shield
>they leave after he dies

>>34124132
>if you think it protects the wamen
>think
I know it improves the gender ratio, and I know the price to pay is censorship of intros. But do you want censorship, or a sausage fest? I'm trying to give most users what they want. Most users are straight men. I think they'd rather have more women to choose from even if that means they sadly can't broach the topic of rape in their very first interaction with a stranger. (And as I type that, it seems so obvious that I'm not sure if I'm being baited)

Relevant stats:
>The ratio's gone from 7.2:1 to 5.9:1 since the rude message filter's been in use
It's obviously still poor. But if I were a guy, I'd still rather have one less guy to compete with for each girl I message

>Over the past month, 1 in 5 users who've sent an intro were told it was too rude
It's a minority of users, but I'll admit there's still a significant proportion of users who want to say some unhinged stuff. Interestingly, the proportion doesn't decrease much if you look at the past day instead of the past month, which could be because individual users are consistent about how polite or rude they are