>>11329750
>>11329757
>I feel like it comes down to Scrag having a good idea of what the standard, well established Blender/SFM art style for regular porn was, so he brought it on for his on his own models
No he just has a type. He basically just took the body type he drew all the time and made it 3D. And the reason people want to use his models is simple: they're free and at least good enough. Most people in this space seldom share their models, and doubly seldom share their models without putting them behind a paywall. So I have to give massive props to Scrag for (eventually) making all his models free and going "Yeah just do whatever the fuck you want with them."

I also don't know what you guys mean by style outside of simply using his models. Maybe you mean variety of scenarios? Everyone should be using fundamental animation techniques, so in theory there's going to be some degree of overlap. Same goes for lighting, really. Though, most people just set up basic lights in their scene and call it a day. One thing I think Scrag needs to work on is displaying emotion through body language and facial expressions. He does it a tiny bit, but not a lot. Most people don't do it at all. Unfortunately, it's hard to blame them when the average person doesn't consciously notice it.

Therein lies the problem with smut animation (and animation in general). All these little details that add up and make an animation satisfying to watch aren't consciously noticed by the average person, especially if they're just trying to fap.

>>11308148
Scrag made a few tweets that did the rounds, starting with his animation where the grey Anon gets butt-slammed into a locker. That got him on plenty of radars, and plenty more when he made animations of Overwatch characters. Overwatch characters are extremely popular.
>even Eskoz has only 60k
Eskoz's stuff is more "extreme" compared to Scrag. Chances are if you like mild hyper proportions, you'll like Scrag's work. It's far more approachable. By contrast, I'm not sure how many people outside of this thread's niche would be into a succubus girl growing a dick, shoving her master into it, then blowing a load (containing her master) into her friend's mouth. By comparison, Eskoz's stuff is way more out there than Scrag's. Scrag's stuff is simply "big lady, big booba", whereas Eskoz is "big lady shoves tiny lady into the milk duct of a friend's breast." It's an acquired taste to say the least.
>>11308155
You'd be hard pressed to find someone into this bullshit that didn't know who Eskoz was. Despite his lower follower count, Eskoz actually makes more than Scrag from patron sites. His Subscribestar and Patreon pull a combined 16K per month, which is fucking crazy. I do think his models now are pushing a little too far into the realism side of things, but the animation itself is stellar. I suppose his follower count is lower because he releases one or two animations a year, and seldom releases WiPs to the public. Not to mention they're all OCs, so he's not pulling in fans from franchises like Overwatch or whatever. I kinda wonder how much traction he'd get if he randomly made a DVa, Tracer, or Widowmaker animation.