Search Results

Found 2 results for "45fa55c9425775b479a13914414d972c" across all boards searching md5.

Anonymous ID: 9i6Jb4OOUnited States /pol/508923263#508923305
6/28/2025, 4:01:45 AM
>Does this affect Voter Rolls for MidTerms?
YES IT DOES THANK YOU FOR ASKING!
>Does this affect census?
YES IT DOES THANK YOU FOR ASKING!

>As it stands right now:
a child born of illegal migrant parents could be denied Documentation and Citizenship status in Ohio but if that same child were to be born in California that child would be granted citizenship - This disjointed chaos will force SCOTUS to make a ruling on the constitutionality of the 14th Amendment as it pertains to the Children of Illegal Migrants within the year and in the meantime the Trump Administration gets to enforce their Executive Order in any state that doesn't fight them on it such as Texas or Ohio, etc.

>How it should be and likely WILL be interpreted by SCOTUS:
The jurisdiction clause, as originally understood, grants birthright citizenship only to children whose parents have full, exclusive allegiance to the United States. The Constitutional text in history shows that children of illegal aliens and illegal aliens who are in the United States temporarily are not citizens by birthright under
the 14th Amendment.

The drafters of the 14th Amendment understood not to grant citizenship to persons, quote, ‘‘owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty.’’ In the first cases decided after ratification, the Supreme Court held that ‘‘jurisdiction’’ in the 14th Amendment means not nearly subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States but completely-but completely-subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.

Of course, illegal aliens and legal temporary United States residents do not owe complete, direct, and immediate allegiance to the United States. Therefore, their children are not citizens by birthright under the 14th Amendment.
Anonymous ID: Srs/Qix+United States /pol/508909169#508909222
6/28/2025, 12:23:49 AM
>As it stands right now:
a child born of illegal migrant parents could be denied Documentation and Citizenship status in Ohio but if that same child were to be born in California that child would be granted citizenship - This disjointed chaos will force SCOTUS to make a ruling on the constitutionality of the 14th Amendment as it pertains to the Children of Illegal Migrants within the year and in the meantime the Trump Administration gets to enforce their Executive Order in any state that doesn't fight them on it such as Texas or Ohio, etc.

>How it should be and likely WILL be interpreted by SCOTUS:
The jurisdiction clause, as originally understood, grants birthright citizenship only to children whose parents have full, exclusive allegiance to the United States. The Constitutional text in history shows that children of illegal aliens and illegal aliens who are in the United States temporarily are not citizens by birthright under
the 14th Amendment.

The drafters of the 14th Amendment understood not to grant citizenship to persons, quote, ‘‘owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty.’’ In the first cases decided after ratification, the Supreme Court held that ‘‘jurisdiction’’ in the 14th Amendment means not nearly subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States but completely-but completely-subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.

Of course, illegal aliens and legal temporary United States residents do not owe complete, direct, and immediate allegiance to the United States. Therefore, their children are not citizens by birthright under the 14th Amendment.