>>531406030
There's a million different ways you cant detect a person's performance outside of just the numbers the game gives you up front.

For instance, a player who is mechanically inept but extremely good at predictions and decision making could be considered a "better player" than a player who understands how to 1v3 as Irelia but loses 2 Void Grubs in the process.

A Singed with a low APM but high win rate can be considered a better player than a player with a high APM but low win rate. A player that AFKs for 15 to 30s after each death (showing frustration, tilt, etc) despite ultimately winning the game can still be branded as "toxic" in some spheres; whereas a player who insta runs back to die again could be labeled as someone trying their best.

In my opinion, there's only a few metrics that actually truly matter when it comes to this game.
>number of deaths
>number of teamfights participated in
>over 100cs average, preferably more
>3+ control wards per game
>conservative but effective use of pings
>low, if any, rage quit games

The game appears to care more about how "serious" you are about playing it at a somewhat competitive level, not as a teehee time sink.

Just my 2c