Neanderthals were actually very smart, probably smrter than humans, and lost to homo sapiens shitskins only because of lower population.
Modern people with most neanderthal dna(east asians and Europeans) are the smartest people in the world.
They were way more cultured than homo sapiens and created art and many craftsmanship techniques

There is no argument against "Race science" (or really, what it really is, evolutionary biology in humans.) That isn't just bad faith skirting around the topic of actual biology, evolution and genetics, and instead just arguing that 19th century race science had incorrect classification of "races".
I've read tonnes of responses of scientists "debunking race science" and all of them are just engaging in bullshit semantics and don't actually address the data sets or medical/biological realities, that their own data shows. It's "Yeah Blacks don't exist, there are Bantu, Zulu, Kongo, Igbo etc" yeah.. what's the point here? That people in the 19th century had an incomplete take on science? Wow. Gravity ain't real because people were wrong about how it functioned before Einstein.
Can anyone explain, why Humans would not function biologically like ANY OTHER ANIMAL?
>Reminder that drift between genome in ethnicites, would result in on average, up to 12 other species, in ANY OTHER ANIMAL.