>>23382611
>A statement isn't dumb just because you disagree with it
The statement is dumb because it's objectively wrong. Gavv isn't anywhere near as well written or entertaining as Build.
explaining why shows that you're not baiting and it's a genuine take.

If i posted the statement "Revice is a top 5 show and just as good as Build" that would be bait but if i gave reasons why then it wouldn't

>>23331273
>>23331327
>>23331351
>I don't want Yuzuki to be blasted with the stench of Morphicon sweat
what a weird complaint. you know she's an actor right? she probably had to suck off a few smelly producers to get that role.