Search Results
6/28/2025, 11:33:37 PM
We have yet to see the Libers.
But so far with what you've seen of the rules, could you name something you're eager to try?
Could you also name something you think changed for the worse? If so, why is it? What's the way to "do it right" in your head?
But so far with what you've seen of the rules, could you name something you're eager to try?
Could you also name something you think changed for the worse? If so, why is it? What's the way to "do it right" in your head?
6/21/2025, 7:15:03 PM
>>95921120
>in most modern militaries the doctrine for attacking an entrenched position is to have like a 3 to 1 advantage in manpower before going in.
Did that ever happen? The Imperium sent 14 million, but the defenders were 8 million. That's less than half the ideal
>Inb4 "8 mil people ≠ 8 mil defenders"
Vraks barely had any economy, or civilians. It was basically all military storage. Essentially 7.5 million PDF.
Not full guardsmen, but not "2/3 are women or children" either. And in some imperial planets, women and children are trained to PDF standard – just look at Cadia or Catachan.
>The forts are titan-proof
I guess that's the imperial standard + the Survivor's fallacy: the only forts standing today are the ones that were hardy enough
>in most modern militaries the doctrine for attacking an entrenched position is to have like a 3 to 1 advantage in manpower before going in.
Did that ever happen? The Imperium sent 14 million, but the defenders were 8 million. That's less than half the ideal
>Inb4 "8 mil people ≠ 8 mil defenders"
Vraks barely had any economy, or civilians. It was basically all military storage. Essentially 7.5 million PDF.
Not full guardsmen, but not "2/3 are women or children" either. And in some imperial planets, women and children are trained to PDF standard – just look at Cadia or Catachan.
>The forts are titan-proof
I guess that's the imperial standard + the Survivor's fallacy: the only forts standing today are the ones that were hardy enough
Page 1