>>2090568
If I actually thought that the devs had any ability to plan ahead making a map that's deliberately awful and impossible to move units on was a way to make sure that no mod could ever pop up and add actual gameplay. But I think they're just out of touch with the people that actually play HOI4. Sure people who just like to look at screenshots may be dazzled but why would anyone with an interest in HOI4 want to bother with it? It's crazy.

>>2083209
It's like ayrt doesn't understand that radicals exist and that this is a good thing because all of that sounds like shit I want to play.

>>2083213
"Another W for the Tsar."

>>2083210
True, KR is several times better than TNO. Every time I feel bad about a KR update, I just look at what TNO is doing and it's all better. I just looked at the thread and the latest rework is changing contents in Colombia, likely meant to remove the only fun part of South America. >>2083196
Your post is wrong though, but not in a good way.
>Added Ukraine which is a demo that railroads you into a single outcome, you get nuked if you do too well
>Replaced the finished Britain content with a collab demo, already being reworked
>Spent several years integrating Antarctica, presented it as a huge win
>Added a new map which is picrel
And TNO devniggers have the GALL to wonder why they're hated by the entire HOI4 community, including all submodders/split-offs.