Some games look visually very historically accurate. But this strife towarda historical accuracy ends here. KCD gets the looks mostly right, bht had a very unusual protagonist, who could beat up the local lord of the town with no consequences and also get filthy rich from selling broken, looted equipment. Manor Lords gets sold as the most historically accurate city builder ever, but it only gets praised for the visuals. The villagers are all equally good at everything, you assign their workplace and domicile like a Communist state planner. No one owns any property. The only population growth us through immigration, because of the limited timescale, but in games like Banished children can reproduce with their parents and close relatives, because they dont bother modelling courtship, genetics and reproduction properly.

When do developers start creating a proper medieveal town builder with inheritance of property, rights and privileges? I want immigrants to be discriminated against, when it comes to accessing "public" land, which turns out is only public for the founding stock and their direct descendents. They refuse to share that privilege.

How would history have changed, if the first vikings in America were more racist and thus aware of the lactose intolerance of non-Whites, which would have prevented them from making enemies with the Amerindians, since they wouldn't deem their raw cow milk as a suitable trade good, thus not giving the natives stomach cramps and not making them think they were poisoned by these naive Nords? Would Vinland have been possible with these hypothetical racist Scandinavians, who would have preserved the initially good relations between the races through their superior understanding of racism?