Search Results
6/30/2025, 4:59:25 AM
>>509091769
An anti-communist liberal named James Lindsey studied and collected info about leftist/"woke" language/social manipulation tactics that were in-line with pic related, and likely kept noticing certain patterns involving large nosed people and this would make him sad. Regardless of personal noticings however, he shared all the stuff he learned but insisted it had nothing to do with Jews. Much of his own audience wasn't kiked like he is though, so he got angy, and started using all the same techniques he revealed to his followers as "dishonest tactics of the left" against those noticers and now spends an inordinate amount of effort on them in particular, including labeling them "woke right" as a form of smear tactic that matches vid related:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfsJxkobPXk
An anti-communist liberal named James Lindsey studied and collected info about leftist/"woke" language/social manipulation tactics that were in-line with pic related, and likely kept noticing certain patterns involving large nosed people and this would make him sad. Regardless of personal noticings however, he shared all the stuff he learned but insisted it had nothing to do with Jews. Much of his own audience wasn't kiked like he is though, so he got angy, and started using all the same techniques he revealed to his followers as "dishonest tactics of the left" against those noticers and now spends an inordinate amount of effort on them in particular, including labeling them "woke right" as a form of smear tactic that matches vid related:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfsJxkobPXk
6/20/2025, 7:41:10 PM
6/18/2025, 9:51:39 PM
>>507892577
>Chafer had a tremendous influence on the evangelical movement
>Ryrie studied with noted evangelical educator Frank E. Gaebelein
i do not trust the words, beliefs, or research of the evangelicals, the arbiters of satan. i do not care what they have said, and i dont care what definitions they came up with.
you are using talmudic rhetoric to try and pervert the Word of Christ by relying on demonic evangelical research.
captcha TY0RA
i denounce the talmud, begone kike.
>Chafer had a tremendous influence on the evangelical movement
>Ryrie studied with noted evangelical educator Frank E. Gaebelein
i do not trust the words, beliefs, or research of the evangelicals, the arbiters of satan. i do not care what they have said, and i dont care what definitions they came up with.
you are using talmudic rhetoric to try and pervert the Word of Christ by relying on demonic evangelical research.
captcha TY0RA
i denounce the talmud, begone kike.
6/13/2025, 7:26:14 PM
>>507237495
ive been studying the talmud recently so that i can accurately refute the "youre misinterpreting the text" claims. the hardest part about talmud study is that a lot of it is religious "case law". they have their books on religious law and lawyering rabbi commentary about it, disregarding the ethic/moral discussion as its a halakhic and not aggadic.
still studying, but for now, im disappointed that, in some circumstances, they may be right about claiming misinterpretation. if theyre lawyering about their own religious law and discussing cases/defining its usage... its kind of funny in a way, because it means theyre being jews about their own religion. it makes a lot of sense actually. the one religion that would do something like this, where you have to interpret a book from a law lens and not a moral/ethical lens, of course it would be the jews.
really disappointed in coming to understand that. still fresh in my research, im trying to find aggadic links or modern halakhic interpretations of some folio or daf. its not easy.
best example about what im talking about is the 3 year old girl rape thing, ketubot 11a/11b iirc. the most you could question is "why was this a law in the first place", and the context of that is its a written down law from 2000 years ago where a lot of the world had similar caselaw/legalities regarding marriage and arranged marriage for children that young.
thats an extremely gay and copium filled answer. i hate it. but, it looks like thats actually how it is. so you cant use ketubot 11a/11b against them, except for questioning why they dont have specific aggadic text referencing it and condemning the practice. they may but i cant find it, best i can find is that they have aggadic text stating its already forbidden in multiple places, so why muddy up halakhic and aggadic text?
im hoping to find some evidence that isnt so gay and jewish. i still feel like this its the "response we give to gentiles". ugh
ive been studying the talmud recently so that i can accurately refute the "youre misinterpreting the text" claims. the hardest part about talmud study is that a lot of it is religious "case law". they have their books on religious law and lawyering rabbi commentary about it, disregarding the ethic/moral discussion as its a halakhic and not aggadic.
still studying, but for now, im disappointed that, in some circumstances, they may be right about claiming misinterpretation. if theyre lawyering about their own religious law and discussing cases/defining its usage... its kind of funny in a way, because it means theyre being jews about their own religion. it makes a lot of sense actually. the one religion that would do something like this, where you have to interpret a book from a law lens and not a moral/ethical lens, of course it would be the jews.
really disappointed in coming to understand that. still fresh in my research, im trying to find aggadic links or modern halakhic interpretations of some folio or daf. its not easy.
best example about what im talking about is the 3 year old girl rape thing, ketubot 11a/11b iirc. the most you could question is "why was this a law in the first place", and the context of that is its a written down law from 2000 years ago where a lot of the world had similar caselaw/legalities regarding marriage and arranged marriage for children that young.
thats an extremely gay and copium filled answer. i hate it. but, it looks like thats actually how it is. so you cant use ketubot 11a/11b against them, except for questioning why they dont have specific aggadic text referencing it and condemning the practice. they may but i cant find it, best i can find is that they have aggadic text stating its already forbidden in multiple places, so why muddy up halakhic and aggadic text?
im hoping to find some evidence that isnt so gay and jewish. i still feel like this its the "response we give to gentiles". ugh
6/12/2025, 9:14:58 PM
6/12/2025, 8:28:06 AM
>>507074348
as far as ive learned so far, sanhedrin 59a of course modern halakha does "not allow killing gentiles who study the talmud". except in certain circumstances. such as if youre studying the talmud with the intent to create a competing religion, or legislate for jews. ill have to see if any posek have any interpretations of that one. ive also seen the defense that the "death penalty" is a heavenly, not earthly, punishment -- this sounds like extreme cope and i need to research this further. its wishy washy, as jews are. the whole talmud is. thats why its hard to study. im trying, anons.
as far as ive learned so far, sanhedrin 59a of course modern halakha does "not allow killing gentiles who study the talmud". except in certain circumstances. such as if youre studying the talmud with the intent to create a competing religion, or legislate for jews. ill have to see if any posek have any interpretations of that one. ive also seen the defense that the "death penalty" is a heavenly, not earthly, punishment -- this sounds like extreme cope and i need to research this further. its wishy washy, as jews are. the whole talmud is. thats why its hard to study. im trying, anons.
Page 1