Search Results
8/4/2025, 2:49:11 PM
my fifth caption. original here:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11279489/#11283039
stroke (outline) text version:
https://files.catbox.moe/f8n9u0.png
i'm shocked the original gen was under 4mb to able to be posted on 4chan losslessly. the original gimp .png export of this caption was 4.48mb and 4.39mb for the "drop shadow" and "stroke" versions respectively, so i had to use the following command in pingo (a png optimizing program) to get them down to 3.88mb (-13.31%) and 3.76mb (-14.26%) respectively:
>pingo -lossless "input.png"
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11279489/#11283039
stroke (outline) text version:
https://files.catbox.moe/f8n9u0.png
i'm shocked the original gen was under 4mb to able to be posted on 4chan losslessly. the original gimp .png export of this caption was 4.48mb and 4.39mb for the "drop shadow" and "stroke" versions respectively, so i had to use the following command in pingo (a png optimizing program) to get them down to 3.88mb (-13.31%) and 3.76mb (-14.26%) respectively:
>pingo -lossless "input.png"
8/4/2025, 2:44:08 PM
my fifth caption. original from >>>/d/ddg:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11279489/#11283039
stroke (outline) text version:
https://files.catbox.moe/f8n9u0.png
i'm shocked the original gen was under 4mb to able to be posted on 4chan losslessly. the original gimp .png export of this caption was 4.48mb and 4.39mb for the "drop shadow" and "stroke" versions respectively, so i had to use the following command in pingo (a png optimizing program) to get them down to 3.88mb (-13.31%) and 3.76mb (-14.26%) respectively:
>pingo -lossless "input.png"
>>11348628
>So when comparing Mamimi to Angel Auxes, the amount of edges you have to draw may for a continuous mass of smegma may may end up being less than individual smears of it.
ok. i see, and i understand. but i still think smegma itself not requiring knowledge on lighting would make it easier for me specifically. i wouldn't try angelauxes' style without taking a crash course on lighting. and for mamimi's smegma, i hoped to try the "bruise" cloud sorta thing generation method i posted a screenshot of an editor explaining to me >>11344389, so i would only have to learn how to erase it into the shapes i want, rather than draw anything outright. i know at a certain point "drawing" involves many skillsets like that, so it is still in practice "drawing" by some definition, but still, i hope to minimize the actual drawing skill (or knowledge) required, as someone with no drawing skill, so i still have my eyes on mamimi's smegma most of all (of what i'm conscious of, anyway)
>I was mostly using the muscular futa one as reference, because I wanted to stick to futa to make a smegma thread have wider appeal.
limiting references to futa only is tough, but, if you intended to show people the references, then, i see. but for the sake of art studies- where you're applying what you take away from the references elsewhere-, arbitrarily narrowing the scope demonstrably (as we just affirmed) risks misunderstanding the artist's standard
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11279489/#11283039
stroke (outline) text version:
https://files.catbox.moe/f8n9u0.png
i'm shocked the original gen was under 4mb to able to be posted on 4chan losslessly. the original gimp .png export of this caption was 4.48mb and 4.39mb for the "drop shadow" and "stroke" versions respectively, so i had to use the following command in pingo (a png optimizing program) to get them down to 3.88mb (-13.31%) and 3.76mb (-14.26%) respectively:
>pingo -lossless "input.png"
>>11348628
>So when comparing Mamimi to Angel Auxes, the amount of edges you have to draw may for a continuous mass of smegma may may end up being less than individual smears of it.
ok. i see, and i understand. but i still think smegma itself not requiring knowledge on lighting would make it easier for me specifically. i wouldn't try angelauxes' style without taking a crash course on lighting. and for mamimi's smegma, i hoped to try the "bruise" cloud sorta thing generation method i posted a screenshot of an editor explaining to me >>11344389, so i would only have to learn how to erase it into the shapes i want, rather than draw anything outright. i know at a certain point "drawing" involves many skillsets like that, so it is still in practice "drawing" by some definition, but still, i hope to minimize the actual drawing skill (or knowledge) required, as someone with no drawing skill, so i still have my eyes on mamimi's smegma most of all (of what i'm conscious of, anyway)
>I was mostly using the muscular futa one as reference, because I wanted to stick to futa to make a smegma thread have wider appeal.
limiting references to futa only is tough, but, if you intended to show people the references, then, i see. but for the sake of art studies- where you're applying what you take away from the references elsewhere-, arbitrarily narrowing the scope demonstrably (as we just affirmed) risks misunderstanding the artist's standard
Page 1