Search Results
7/19/2025, 9:10:35 PM
>>715894186
Firaxis has changed their post-launch timeline to prioritize gameplay improvements and then give a very muted acknowledgement that some of their key features did not land the way they hoped. The only time that a developer would do these things is if they have data saying that something's wrong. If the game had sold to their expectations (which were probably pretty high all things considered) we'd be on the second Civ/Leader pack by now.
As of now, they are in a Damned if they do, Damned if they don't.
If they remove the civ-switching, it's current playerbase of loyal fans who defended this game against it's evil "boomer haters" will feel angry and betrayed that they caved in to the "toxic" people, but if they don't nix the civ-switching the game will continue it's slow march towards having barely any players with nobody to buy the newest DLC.
Firaxis has changed their post-launch timeline to prioritize gameplay improvements and then give a very muted acknowledgement that some of their key features did not land the way they hoped. The only time that a developer would do these things is if they have data saying that something's wrong. If the game had sold to their expectations (which were probably pretty high all things considered) we'd be on the second Civ/Leader pack by now.
As of now, they are in a Damned if they do, Damned if they don't.
If they remove the civ-switching, it's current playerbase of loyal fans who defended this game against it's evil "boomer haters" will feel angry and betrayed that they caved in to the "toxic" people, but if they don't nix the civ-switching the game will continue it's slow march towards having barely any players with nobody to buy the newest DLC.
7/8/2025, 3:26:30 PM
Page 1