>>716492790
>Time for game companies to catch up
Not unless the writers themselves, either, get shackled again by marketing trying to appeal to normal people, or, straight up get replaced by different writers. It's just that simple. Pic very much related.

>>715552301

>>714666294
pic related worked for me.
but it wasn't bait.
i was just pissed.

>>714623093
Do you really think i'm going to type up an effort post every single time /v/ recycles the same topic? Especially with the high probability that the thread dies 5 posts later? Of course not. I have a list of effort posts that i copy/paste when the topic comes up again. Here. Have another one. Just for you.