>>511073500
Miggers have been real quiet about this one. I wonder why?

>>510395840
I support this. I think it’s a much better use of resources in terms of long term impact.

>>509702469
Is coffee good for you?

>>509065935
I’ll go through the effort of giving you a real answer.

When western corporations say
>”there’s a labor shortage, we need immigrants!”
99% of the time what they actually mean is
>”We don’t want to pay fair wages and nobody wants to work for scraps, we need desperate third worlders with lower standards to undercut the market and work for cheap”
Nobody voted for this, but the corrupt greedy bastards in charge are addicted to cheap foreign labor and infinitely climbing real estate valuations, so they keep giving us infinity poopskins that we DO NOT WANT. Those jobs belong to native born citizens at good wages, not shitskin slaves

>>508760085
Hello Pratyuksh Bansal from Zurich, who passed a quiz on linear independence ten years ago and still remembers it as the crowning achievement of his life!

Indian woman eating.

>>508739422
It’s quite simple; if you don’t plan on living in that residential property, you will pay an absentee landlord tax and have to follow regulations that are so rigid that it’s more attractive to invest your money elsewhere (disincentivize speculators, lower demand)

There will be exceptions/tax breaks if you built the property yourself, and you will be partially reimbursed for regulatory compliance/permit fees if you get residents living in there relatively quickly (incentivizes lower prices by creating a buyers market where the owner wants to close, increases supply)

There are lots of other ways to do this, but so many people screech “commie! commie retard!” if you suggest that the housing market should be restructured to incentivize housing people. I’m not advocating for free housing or anything, just kicking out the parasites who make it impossible for regular people to move out of mom and dad’s place until they’re 35.

>>508725372

https://news.yale.edu/2019/02/05/taste-fat-may-have-made-us-human-says-study

https://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/pdfy-DDoNCJJ_Wt0qOH7e/Catching%20Fire%20%5BHow%20Cooking%20Made%20Us%20Human%5D.pdf

This isn’t “my theory”. It’s an extremely well known hypothesis in anthropology and a standard part of any intro anthropology course, at least in U.S universities; maybe Hindutva diploma mills find it distasteful and choose to ignore it.

I know you’re gonna shift the goalposts and seethe that these aren’t high profile articles in Nature, but they’re good summaries and you can follow the links and sources like a big boy

>>508222729
This guy is a pajeet. His name is Pratyuksh Bansal (from Zurich). He is obsessed with “pwning the white incels” and spends all day posting ragebait and racebait on pol. It’s really quite sad.

>>508162137
Women in general are quite boring. I only associate with 120+ IQ individuals, though, so the women in my life have been at least tolerable for the most part.

This is what you get for spending time with an 84 IQ spic.