Search Results
7/16/2025, 9:34:00 PM
Would it be a stretch to suggest that Crackdown either has low-superhuman strength or develops it over time?
For a while I've been of an opinion that his body being entropy-resistant would only reflect on his durability, but lately I've been thinking about how much of physical limitation comes *exactly* from the fact that human muscle has a certain tensile strength limit that Arthur should realistically be able to overcome.
For a while I've been of an opinion that his body being entropy-resistant would only reflect on his durability, but lately I've been thinking about how much of physical limitation comes *exactly* from the fact that human muscle has a certain tensile strength limit that Arthur should realistically be able to overcome.
6/20/2025, 8:04:28 PM
Damn, that's a lot of Crackdown(-adjacent) discource I haven't been able to participate in.
>>149076853
Pastebin seems on point except for that old greentext I wrote. Having Arthur's cracks also act as a bag of holding was done away with by me cause his powers already feel like they have too many applications.
>>149077327
>>149077406
While there is some slight trauma over the puppy accident, the reason why Arthur doesn't kill is actually pretty obvious — he doesn't do it because he doesn't view it as a right thing to do in most cases. He's actually concerned over moral ramifications of taking a life and doesn't think much of those who take it lightly, be it sociopathic villains or /co/verse civvies yammering on about what vigilantes like him should or shouldn't do since they aren't the ones getting their hands dirty. That being said, his natural aversion to killing is actually surprisingly low. It's not inconceivable for him to take a life under some very specific circumstances and for it to not weigh on his conscience that hard. In fact, he almost killed Wurmeck during their fight.
>>149076853
Pastebin seems on point except for that old greentext I wrote. Having Arthur's cracks also act as a bag of holding was done away with by me cause his powers already feel like they have too many applications.
>>149077327
>>149077406
While there is some slight trauma over the puppy accident, the reason why Arthur doesn't kill is actually pretty obvious — he doesn't do it because he doesn't view it as a right thing to do in most cases. He's actually concerned over moral ramifications of taking a life and doesn't think much of those who take it lightly, be it sociopathic villains or /co/verse civvies yammering on about what vigilantes like him should or shouldn't do since they aren't the ones getting their hands dirty. That being said, his natural aversion to killing is actually surprisingly low. It's not inconceivable for him to take a life under some very specific circumstances and for it to not weigh on his conscience that hard. In fact, he almost killed Wurmeck during their fight.
Page 1