I don't know a whole lot about conditioning but there seems to me to be two main types of conditioning. One is associating objects/concepts/words/phrases/etc in the mind with emotions, mostly just good/bad. The other type of conditioning has to do with propositions. Something X is something Y. Every time you hear X you instantly think Y. Every time you hear "saturated fat" you think "unhealthy" for example. The conditioned mind doesn't go further than propositions like for example:

>Saturated fat is unhealthy.

See the pic. You need to actually study how to parse texts. Jews know this, that's why they're powerful. You study grammar, logic and rhetoric, then you can take propositions which just pop into your mind and work on them, do you have any argument why saturated fat is unhealthy, anything to back it up, etc.

https://gutenberg.ca/ebooks/huxleya-bravenewworld/huxleya-bravenewworld-00-e.html#chapter02

>Roses and electric shocks, the khaki of Deltas and a whiff of asafoetida--wedded indissolubly before the child can speak. But wordless conditioning is crude and wholesale; cannot bring home the finer distinctions, cannot inculcate the more complex courses of behaviour. For that there must be words, but words without reason. In brief, hypnopædia.
>'The greatest moralizing and socializing force of all time.'

>>508941045
I agree that this discussion is totally fruitless. But the reason is that you know absolutely nothing about logic. First learn what the difference is between a proposition and an argument. Next learn what ad hominem means.

https://youtu.be/U3Jm8zF7bJ8&t=2543

After that I recommend that you begin studying beginner materials on logic, for example one of the materials I linked in this thread:

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/508076799/