Search Results
7/16/2025, 6:53:44 PM
>>96104864
I still think it's funny (and a little insulting) that they grabbed generic Archon art from a more recent edition for their stupid marketing rather than the one old portrait he has.
I still think it's funny (and a little insulting) that they grabbed generic Archon art from a more recent edition for their stupid marketing rather than the one old portrait he has.
6/25/2025, 1:29:52 PM
>>95948848
That's why he's stuck in the 3rd edition aesthetic when the rest of the faction got redesigned in 5e. He's literally a relic of a range that doesn't exist anymore.
For some reason GW doesn't like showing that art anymore either and will use a generic Archon as a stand-in for him in their own advertising campaign instead of that portrait.
That's why he's stuck in the 3rd edition aesthetic when the rest of the faction got redesigned in 5e. He's literally a relic of a range that doesn't exist anymore.
For some reason GW doesn't like showing that art anymore either and will use a generic Archon as a stand-in for him in their own advertising campaign instead of that portrait.
Page 1