>>510852972
>More lies
You are seething at something that does not exist
This "version" of Catholicism that you have in your head does not exist
If you have a problem with the Catholic faith and what it actually teaches, go ahead and give your issue
>inb4 there's nothing because you don't know anything about our position besides the same 90 IQ lies you learned from hillbilly pastors that learned it from their pastors and none of these people ever verified anything

>>510329470
>what is the legality of trapping your property if you clearly label that you have traps on your property?
Reckless endangerment and all charges that stem from it. The concept in law is that you cant set deadly traps because you dont control the weapon, you arent asserting a right to self defense by identifying and perceiving a threat, you are basically shooting into a crowd or swinging a sword at a crowd of unknown people that you havent identified as a threat. If someone sends pizza's to your house, you might not have ordered it, but a pizza delivery person would reasonably expect that you had invited them onto your property and would be entitled to walk up to your door and knock on it. Even inside your home the same situation exists, there are people that can reasonably access your home (like police for exigent cirmstances; firefighters, etc) and you cant attack them.

Also you can just warn your way out of things, you cant put a sign in your yard that says "my dog kills people", and then if the pizza delivery guy comes to deliver pizzas and your dog kills him in your yard, you are still going to get reckless charges. You cant just warn people that your weapons are reckless, and make yourself exempt from legal requirements for use of force.

>>510043299
>That's ok.. get that dick girl!
Please tell me there aren't "men" who actually talk like this

>>22922800
>That's ok.. get that dick girl!
Please tell me there aren't "men" who actually talk like this

If everyone in the country just donated me one dollar I'd be a millionaire

It took me a while to realize, but after a while I've become aware of the fact that I am indeed an ass man. I prefer asses to boobs. Both are pretty good, yes, but asses are way better. Boobs are better to look at since they are close to the face and if you meet a girl with a nice face boobs compliment that. But asses are on another level entirely. A girl with a nice ass is the best out of the two. I never understood exactly why some people were into asses as much as they were, but after some time I've begun to understand it. There is nothing better in this world than a woman with a nice ass. I admit it, it is among some of the best things there are in life, to be able to appreciate a nice ass means a lot.

Almost every single mecha is piloted by some teenager. Is there a show where that isnt the case? Or at least a show where its slightly different?

it's been wiped off the internet, hasn't it

>>507474709
You shouldn't judge people by things that didn't choose anon.

Nevermind what the OP said, here's a real tough question for you high IQ /biz/ posters: If you had unlimited access to a product for free, would you sell them at a very low price? Would it be the best choice to sell this item at a very low price at first, then raise the price according to how popular the item then became? Or would you remain selling it at the initial low price? Say this product was provided to you infinitely and completely free, what would be the best choice?