Search Results
7/10/2025, 10:15:26 PM
>>24525548
read Evola
read Evola
6/20/2025, 1:48:27 PM
Why do all the retards say Evola was in favor of using sexuality for spiritual purposes?
OK, Evola wrote about sexuality in a spiritual context (Eros and the Mysteries of Love), but that doesn't mean he advocated for some kind of "spiritual libertinism." Anyone who says that has a midwit-tier understanding of his work.
For Evola—and this is self-evident—the conditions required for a relationship to become a means of spiritual ascent are impossibly rare:
>"As we have said, these possibilities are exceptional in the modern world and can only arise as a result of a happy chance, because of what they presuppose and also because of the absolutely unfavorable circumstances resulting from the 'blunting' that often characterizes woman as she has been shaped, in general, by modern civilization. It is not easy, in fact, to imagine an 'absolute woman' in the guise of an 'evolved,' more or less Americanized, girl. More generally, it is also not very easy to imagine the coexistence of the required qualities in a woman, such as we have indicated above, with those required for a relationship that, as we were saying, should also be 'modern,' that is to say, free, clear, and independent." —Julius Evola, Ride the Tiger
For Evola, the destruction of morals, the disappearance of modesty, generalized promiscuity, and the masculinization of the female sex are all factors that render 99.99% of women—and therefore any relationship—spiritually inept.
You only have to look around to see that most women hope to keep the men they sleep with on a leash. Every time a man enters a relationship he ends up totally castrated, forced to endure the whims of his partner.
It's obvious that under these conditions, with no mental peace, it's impossible to do anything spiritually.
OK, Evola wrote about sexuality in a spiritual context (Eros and the Mysteries of Love), but that doesn't mean he advocated for some kind of "spiritual libertinism." Anyone who says that has a midwit-tier understanding of his work.
For Evola—and this is self-evident—the conditions required for a relationship to become a means of spiritual ascent are impossibly rare:
>"As we have said, these possibilities are exceptional in the modern world and can only arise as a result of a happy chance, because of what they presuppose and also because of the absolutely unfavorable circumstances resulting from the 'blunting' that often characterizes woman as she has been shaped, in general, by modern civilization. It is not easy, in fact, to imagine an 'absolute woman' in the guise of an 'evolved,' more or less Americanized, girl. More generally, it is also not very easy to imagine the coexistence of the required qualities in a woman, such as we have indicated above, with those required for a relationship that, as we were saying, should also be 'modern,' that is to say, free, clear, and independent." —Julius Evola, Ride the Tiger
For Evola, the destruction of morals, the disappearance of modesty, generalized promiscuity, and the masculinization of the female sex are all factors that render 99.99% of women—and therefore any relationship—spiritually inept.
You only have to look around to see that most women hope to keep the men they sleep with on a leash. Every time a man enters a relationship he ends up totally castrated, forced to endure the whims of his partner.
It's obvious that under these conditions, with no mental peace, it's impossible to do anything spiritually.
Page 1