>>105741704
>wonder if it's adding a watermark or some shit
no, I think it's just the weakness of the vae encode/decode process, that's lossy

>>105736987
>this kind of model is simply not production ready
will it ever? I think it can't work if we keep using lossy operations like VAE's encode/decode

>>105729230
>3 edits at once
y'know, what this anon did is smart, because if you make too much iterations you'll notice the jpg artifacts, so might aswell ask the model to do most edits on one or two iterations