>>715896251
huh that was pretty blatantly anti-player, like the sort of game that doesn't care if you're too stupid to play it and isn't going to tell you a goddamn thing.

>>40127085

I didn't say incels aren't marginalized.

>Your perspective is that it's fact based, but that's just your perspective, not facts.

You didn't point out which opinion isn't fact based. If it's the opinion that incels aren't marginalized that's not my opinion.

Again heterosexuals aren't marginalized. When we say this we mean targeted for their heterosexuality. If OP wanted to make a case for gay incels I wouldn't reply, because they're gay. They're making a case for all incels, which isn't lgbt by metrics I already outlined as unusual, ineffective and largely unnecessary due to the normalization of heterosexuality.

These are all conclusions based on facts like the amount of representation in lgbt communities, what advertising of lgbt events and media coverage look like, what laws effect what groups in certain states etc. It should not be ambiguous what groups are most commonly associated with the lgbt, or the most common and and influential objectives of the lgbt movement.

Neither of those include heterosexual incels. OP does. Therefore OPs objective and that of the lgbt do not align.