Search Results
7/14/2025, 9:19:20 AM
>>149389676
>This shit is so fucking purposefully fucking meaningless and vague and can changed and switched up for anything you do/don't like
How is it either of those things? I gave three examples of shit that wouldn’t fly today and you can’t even address them. You’re just pretending that it’s not happening. Why can’t you argue this?
>Katara calling Sokka sexist
And? Why are you acting like that alone damns it?
>having a "humiliation ritual" with the Kyoshi warriors or being comedic relief
You mean the same place where he gets a cut girl to fall for him? You seem to be purposely leaving context out. I don’t know why you can’t argue honestly, is it because you know you’re wrong?
>Every fucking time some new Avatar shit comes out /co/ screeches over cripples(which atla had multiples forever) or someone being too brown(which Pathik)
The best part is that’s all the characters are to you, cripples and browns. They’re not characters. That is the difference between what ATLA did and what is coming out now.
>I've probably been here longer than you fucking have you fucking subhuman larper
If that were true you wouldn’t need to say it. You’re getting overly defensive about something because it hit a nerve and in doing so proving my point.
>Go make another thread about how xyz is too black or some shit
Why can’t you talk about cartoons? Is it that hard? Is your brain that fried by your own culture war shit?
>This shit is so fucking purposefully fucking meaningless and vague and can changed and switched up for anything you do/don't like
How is it either of those things? I gave three examples of shit that wouldn’t fly today and you can’t even address them. You’re just pretending that it’s not happening. Why can’t you argue this?
>Katara calling Sokka sexist
And? Why are you acting like that alone damns it?
>having a "humiliation ritual" with the Kyoshi warriors or being comedic relief
You mean the same place where he gets a cut girl to fall for him? You seem to be purposely leaving context out. I don’t know why you can’t argue honestly, is it because you know you’re wrong?
>Every fucking time some new Avatar shit comes out /co/ screeches over cripples(which atla had multiples forever) or someone being too brown(which Pathik)
The best part is that’s all the characters are to you, cripples and browns. They’re not characters. That is the difference between what ATLA did and what is coming out now.
>I've probably been here longer than you fucking have you fucking subhuman larper
If that were true you wouldn’t need to say it. You’re getting overly defensive about something because it hit a nerve and in doing so proving my point.
>Go make another thread about how xyz is too black or some shit
Why can’t you talk about cartoons? Is it that hard? Is your brain that fried by your own culture war shit?
7/13/2025, 5:59:12 AM
>>715322985
>Still hasn't said if he liked it or not
Because you’re trying to use the question to deflect away from your own failure because you embarrassed yourself.
>Odd thing to hide. It is not like it is some gotcha question
It is give that no matter what I say you’re going to find some issue. You already tried implying that if I didn’t like it then I’m stupid and obsessed like the schizo you keep bringing up. And if I say I did like it then you’ll say how I’m a fanboy defending it even though I have said nothing to defend it. You’re trying to force a catch 22 in the most blatant way possible.
>Still hasn't said if he liked it or not
Because you’re trying to use the question to deflect away from your own failure because you embarrassed yourself.
>Odd thing to hide. It is not like it is some gotcha question
It is give that no matter what I say you’re going to find some issue. You already tried implying that if I didn’t like it then I’m stupid and obsessed like the schizo you keep bringing up. And if I say I did like it then you’ll say how I’m a fanboy defending it even though I have said nothing to defend it. You’re trying to force a catch 22 in the most blatant way possible.
7/3/2025, 10:52:45 PM
>>149258265
I see you’ve played baggy-rolly before
I see you’ve played baggy-rolly before
Page 1