>>716530612
>if a game doesn't have 200k+ concurrent players, then it's shit

Zoomers were a mistake

>>714997354
>if a genre doesn't have 500k concurrent players it's dead!

Why are normals so fucking retarded

>>40599985
>That's all well and good until you need it to perform actual thought. Go and fucking chat with some brokedick ChatGPT powered fucking "virtual assistant" and tell me how good it is at solving "you're" problems.

Imagine being on /x/ and priding yourself in drinking the public facing koolaid. Yes I'm sure OpenAI, Google are spending >$100 billion to make funny videos/pics/chatbots. I'm sure they're giving us unfettered access to the most cutting edge models. Just like how DeepSeek was totally an organic release by a Chinese quant company right? CCP was totally okay with them releasing the most advanced model to the West for free because that doesn't go against all historical sociopolitical precedent right haha!!?

AI models will never get better right? Their current state (public facing) of brokedick ChatGPT represents their final capabilities right haha!!! Just like Kenbak-1 in 1971, the first ever consumer facing personal computer remember that one??

>I like dev
>should I get games by dev