>>149969147

>>510527822
It's unfortunately true. It went like this:
>Celts came to Britain across landbridges
>Romans invade and slaughter the Celts, leaving the remainder in what would become Scotland and Ireland
>Saxons invade and exploit the Roman withdrawal and start taking over properly, creating the Anglo-Saxons
>the Vikings invade and get some land given to them, and conquer for some other parts, they get mostly folded in to the Anglo-Saxons eventually
>the Normans invade (and they're just Vikings who became French), and they win against the Anglo-Saxons, and take over, creating the first proper castles
>hundreds of years of this, the resulting population is a polluted mix of Celt, Anglo-Saxon, Viking, and Norman (strangely, the Romans never interbred notably enough to leave any trace, they really did see Celts as sub-human and for 400 years kept genetically distant, it's really impressive)
Our "native" population is the result of centuries of being invaded by others. There's a reason those of us who know our history are extremely concerned about this current invasion of shitskins.

>>510094801
That deserves serious study.
Turks go mad in Germany, in another example. Maybe you could say jews go mad in Israel, which conveniently for them is their home. By design? Perhaps.

There must be other examples but I'm drawing a blank now.

>>212403225
They think the whole site shares not only their politics, but the desire to shape every discussion into a political one.

I wish someone would put them in a tube.
>PWAAAAAHHH

>>101549009
>mfw I remember a thing even though it happened in the past and not recently (wtf????)

>>507810623
ropes INSIDE the poles!
who thinks up this shit??

>>21403978
/sci/ has figured out time travel