1.) It wasn't a military loss (in fact, Saigon fell after the military already left the country)

2.) It's only considered a loss in America itself ironically enough. For the Vietnamese it is taught as a Civil War, with America simply backing a side of it rather than being directly involved. It would be like considering the American Civil War a loss for Great Britain because they floated backing the Confederates

3.) Vietnam and the US maintain good relations today, so it's mostly water under the bridge.

It seems to me that the only people treating Vietnam as some point of humiliation for Americans are either brown third worldists or self-hating Chuds.

>>81907822
Yeah I was thinking some kind of antichrist thing.
Gnostic Incels it is.

How would a "gas powered engine" even work in a world that lacks the manufacturing tolerances capable of high compression ratios and/or without the ability to generate high enough current to drive a spark gap needed for ignition? All early engines were steam engines as they are external combustion engines as opposed to internal combustion engines and thus do not require either of these things to operate.

dear federal agents, arrange 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in order of your likings - most favor to least favor

thank you for your service

>>936308549
>maturing to 6 years old so you can finally post on the old anime retro greentext website

What happens when horny boys and men, thinking it’s the end, start to get a little frisky?

>>211751045
I’m a chad