>>510854687
>it is the websters dictionary definition
You allow the websters dictionary to tell you how to derive your theology? If they change the definition in a few years, will this impact your theology? Will you adapt your theology and arguments to cater to this websters dictionary definition?
I'm not trying to be a dick, I'm trying to highlight that maybe this isn't how Christianity is supposed to work

>>507888331
Go to confession, midwit