Search Results
7/11/2025, 2:23:38 PM
>>510085927
>rejecting the endless cycle of hate and violence
Aka rejecting reality, which leads to exactly what happens in the story irl. Extinction, defeat, etc.
> Running away isn’t cowardice
I never said it was cowardice. I said it was hypocrisy. Because if your ideology that states "conflict is unecessary" can only solve conflict by avoiding it alltogether, its based on a false premise and is demonstrably untenable.
>Conflict happens because people are flawed
False. Btw this is a typical linguistic game people from your line of thought enjoy playing.
"Flawed" implies that if only we could unlock "true" human potential, that all our problems would dissapear. And usually the argument is made that if we removed some "anomaly" or "impurity" from our social environment (e.g. racism, sexism, etc) this true, collaborative human nature would naturally emerge. Its a silly, russeou-/lockean assertion.
In reality humans are simply creatures of acquisition, because negentropy is the precondition for complexity, aka continued human life. Conflict emerges when negotiation (aka TRADE) for acquisition between two competing parties is insufficient to satisfy their needs/desires. This conflict, or violence if you would like to call it that, can express overtly as FORCE, or covertly, socially as SEDUCTION.
In fact, the linguistic argumentation you are currently engaging in that this very moment is in and of itself that exact form of social warfare (SEDUCTION), which carries the inherent and express intent of achieving your desired end state of ACQUISITION, aka opportunities, wealth, rights, privledges, etc.
>rejecting the endless cycle of hate and violence
Aka rejecting reality, which leads to exactly what happens in the story irl. Extinction, defeat, etc.
> Running away isn’t cowardice
I never said it was cowardice. I said it was hypocrisy. Because if your ideology that states "conflict is unecessary" can only solve conflict by avoiding it alltogether, its based on a false premise and is demonstrably untenable.
>Conflict happens because people are flawed
False. Btw this is a typical linguistic game people from your line of thought enjoy playing.
"Flawed" implies that if only we could unlock "true" human potential, that all our problems would dissapear. And usually the argument is made that if we removed some "anomaly" or "impurity" from our social environment (e.g. racism, sexism, etc) this true, collaborative human nature would naturally emerge. Its a silly, russeou-/lockean assertion.
In reality humans are simply creatures of acquisition, because negentropy is the precondition for complexity, aka continued human life. Conflict emerges when negotiation (aka TRADE) for acquisition between two competing parties is insufficient to satisfy their needs/desires. This conflict, or violence if you would like to call it that, can express overtly as FORCE, or covertly, socially as SEDUCTION.
In fact, the linguistic argumentation you are currently engaging in that this very moment is in and of itself that exact form of social warfare (SEDUCTION), which carries the inherent and express intent of achieving your desired end state of ACQUISITION, aka opportunities, wealth, rights, privledges, etc.
7/5/2025, 12:44:26 PM
>>81720875
>>81720874
"This creep said Hi to me in town, he sexually harrassed me! I'm calling the police"
>>81720874
"This creep said Hi to me in town, he sexually harrassed me! I'm calling the police"
7/3/2025, 10:55:19 AM
>>280180052
I never read a single chapter, "I" only come "here" for the "party".
I never read a single chapter, "I" only come "here" for the "party".
Page 1