>>716108345
>Playersexual supports are always doomed to feel really flaccid and vague
doesnt seem to be a major problem in engage.
>the dynamic between two lesbian or homosexual partners is going to be different than between a heterosexual pair.
why waste dev time for this?
>>716108359
>If everyone is bi, they dont give me a "and they had lots of babies" end because having to account for fags.
its not a problem in engage because we dont have child units. its not like you can literally fuck the characters. its a waste of dev time to split the support. id rather them put the effort in the gameplay than support that barely matters

>>715761050

>>714326359
I love Goldmary so much bros