Search Results

Found 2 results for "9078f2b263799fd14bfc0b560952da8a" across all boards searching md5.

Anonymous Australia /sp/149854334#149863233
7/19/2025, 11:48:03 PM
>The Luciano Leilua decision was outrageous. There were five minutes and 30 seconds to go, they were on their 30m or 40m line, the player never got to his feet … he has to get to his feet before he plants the ball. It’s been the rule all year, and it costs us today.

>We go down field from the back of that, Kikau passes the ball, it hits Sloan and goes forward. In the collision, that’s a knock-on. In 100 years, that’s a knock on. That was at the 78th minute mark.

>They’re a good side the Bulldogs, they compete hard, but there were some decisions tonight that cost us two competition points, and could cost us an opportunity to play semi-finals.
Anonymous Australia /sp/149136487#149154061
6/13/2025, 2:47:42 PM
>>149154039
>Oh please, spare me the poetic gymnastics. You’re really pretending that slapping "Cat’s in the Cradle" over a feel-good dad montage is some kind of high-concept emotional contrast? No, it’s just lazy or clueless editing. The entire song is explicitly about neglect, missed moments, and generational emotional absence - not “look how beautiful fatherhood is.” It’s not a bittersweet tribute, it’s a gut-wrenching warning, and using it to celebrate present, involved dads is like playing "Tears in Heaven" at a baby shower. This isn’t some nuanced juxtaposition; it’s a total misread. You don’t "reclaim" a narrative by ignoring its meaning. That’s like putting Requiem for a Dream music over a Nike ad and calling it bold. The message of Cat’s in the Cradle isn’t "cherish your kids"; it’s "you blew it and now it’s too late." So unless your montage ends with emotional devastation and a phone call that goes unanswered, you’re using the wrong song.