>>716459629
>It's shit, the idea of investment in of itself is fine

Investors are an inherent problem of capitalism

Money doesn't build anything

Throw a pile of money on the ground, nothing happens. They dollar bills don't get up and start building a house or a bridge.

So someone spending money, and then claiming to "own" something, and therefor able to extract money from people who work, while they themselves do NOTHING productive, is an inherent problem with capitalism.

>>509314971
So bread rose 60% in price

Why? People don't care at small total numbers, but when something goes up 60% in a few years people should be fucking asking why

Did wages go up 60%?

Was inflation 60%?

It's not just bread it's EVERYTHING did this, there's going to be a breaking point soon

2028 will be unironic communist president and that's a good thing

>>509218992
There's nothing wrong with this because their wealth was stolen in the first place

They obviously didn't work for that money, they go to sleep and wake up millions of dollars while they were sleeping

Stocks = excess value generated by workers that goes to lazy parasite shareholders who do nothing productive

>but they'll leave the country :(

GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD

Freeze all their assets on the way out, BYE

Retards really think if every billionaire died overnight literally anything bad would happen, as if they're paving the roads or fixing the electric poles