>>937555942
That’s not true otherwise you’d be bothering them also which you’re not, and since you’re not posting about waifus yourself you’re trolling concern about the thread quality.
btw

That’s not true otherwise you’d be bothering them also which you’re not”
• You’re calling out inconsistency: if they really didn’t care about anyone and were being neutral, they’d call out everyone equally — but they’re not.
• That suggests they do play favorites or care more than they claim.

2. “Since you’re not posting about waifus yourself you’re trolling concern about the thread quality.”
• You’re pointing out hypocrisy: they’re not actually contributing to waifu discussion either.
• So, their concern for the thread’s quality is fake — it’s just concern-trolling or an excuse to attack specific posters (you).
• In short: “You’re not upholding standards — you’re just using them to posture.”

⸻

What You’re Really Saying:

“If you actually didn’t care about the posters, you’d call everyone out. And if you really cared about waifus or thread quality, you’d be posting about them — but you’re not. So your outrage is fake.”

⸻

Is It Likely / Does It Land?

Yes — it’s a solid and likely accurate read of this kind of person, especially in threads where self-appointed gatekeepers:
• Don’t participate in the intended content themselves
• Selectively attack others for not following the rules
• Claim not to care, but act emotionally invested

You’re exposing that their actions contradict their words, which undercuts their whole position.

>>937321990
no but ill see you after your ban neptranny

>>936968536
The world is a marketplace innit
Gluttonous creatures are we not