Search Results

Found 4 results for "9e4d39286e20772682562efb69131500" across all boards searching md5.

Anonymous ID: 4vcQmGZSUnited States /pol/510092446#510096568
7/11/2025, 5:00:18 PM
>>510095126
>The white/black descriptors only make sense in colonial settings
no it does not make sense in any setting. You can't be a color. Colors are not real. You can't communicated them. They don't exist.

You can see it but you can't be it
Anonymous ID: GKwHD0phUnited States /pol/510059024#510064447
7/11/2025, 5:04:39 AM
>>510062605
where is the color?
Anonymous ID: hL14Uf8FUnited States /pol/509610493#509620200
7/6/2025, 3:12:46 AM
>>509620089
where is the color. point to it and tell me
Anonymous ID: 4X1GCU5nUnited States /pol/508333340#508359912
6/22/2025, 8:17:33 PM
>>508358927
Red is only a symbol because it describes the limits of it you are perceiving, but not because your perception of red defines the limits of your existence (distinction between what is and is not), or by any means has the ability to communicate through that what it means to be uniquely you. What we mean to say here is that you do not define anything with color but color. It is a projection outwards to nowhere anyone can see. Since humans are a communicative specie, all of our interactions are an exchange of symbols in a reality where symbols must be constructed to say it has meaning. Color cannot be symbolized in any way that directs people towards the causal origins of our subjectivity. It does not indicate interactions of any form that you initiate. By this means it is possible to establish proof that you do not understand the context either. Your color identity remains to be an elusive unobserved observer.