Search Results
7/25/2025, 5:34:00 AM
>>716371227
>Besides that, the aircraft do not handle like a sim at all and the game is clearly made for controller.
The planes feel arcade because actual planes with fly-by-wire feel arcade. Falcon 4.0/BMS Falcon is the most realistic simulator ever created, and it feels absolutely on-rails because an actual F-16 feels on-rails. The planes computers are doing a thousand little inputs for you to smooth things out. All the flips and goofy shit you can do in an Ifrit/Revoker are just things real Su-30s/F-22s can do at actual airshows because having a >1.1 TWR and thrust vectoring just lets you ignore aerodynamics.
The dev was demonstrating the physics on a stream, and the everything from washout/transonic drag/wing twist/vortex rings/flapping/coningetc was being simulated on the helicopter rotors, so the actual effort in aerodynamics was there. I agree with you on AI being stupid at airports though
>Besides that, the aircraft do not handle like a sim at all and the game is clearly made for controller.
The planes feel arcade because actual planes with fly-by-wire feel arcade. Falcon 4.0/BMS Falcon is the most realistic simulator ever created, and it feels absolutely on-rails because an actual F-16 feels on-rails. The planes computers are doing a thousand little inputs for you to smooth things out. All the flips and goofy shit you can do in an Ifrit/Revoker are just things real Su-30s/F-22s can do at actual airshows because having a >1.1 TWR and thrust vectoring just lets you ignore aerodynamics.
The dev was demonstrating the physics on a stream, and the everything from washout/transonic drag/wing twist/vortex rings/flapping/coningetc was being simulated on the helicopter rotors, so the actual effort in aerodynamics was there. I agree with you on AI being stupid at airports though
7/9/2025, 2:36:35 PM
SCHLOPPEN SCHLAPPEN
Page 1